Opioids

September 21, 2007

Narcotic Related Adverse Events

As presented in Moore TJ (1) and discussed in Med Page Today (September 10, 2007) reports to the FDA of drug related injury, disability and death nearly tripled during the period of 1998 – 2005.  Analgesics and immune system modulators accounted for the majority of adverse events.  Oxycodone was suspected in 5548 of 15107 reported deaths.  Michael Ashburn (our new director of pain medicine) has published three papers investigating aspects of opioid analgesia related adverse events.  In 1990 he and his colleagues (2) determined the frequency of hypoxemia and apnea after sedation with midazolam and fentanyl.  Using volunteers they found that midazolam alone (0.05 mg/kg) had no effect.  Fentanyl alone (2 mcg/kg) produced hypoxemia (oxygen saturation less than 90%) in half the subjects but no apnea.  However, the combination of midazolam and fentanyl produced hypoxemia in 11 of 12 subjects and apnea in 6 of 12 subjects.  In 1994, Ashburn, Love and Pace (3) reported on respiratory related critical events associated with patient controlled analgesia.  They evaluated 3785 patients who received PCA for a total of 11521 patient care days.  Fourteen critical events occurred and four of these led to increased patient care requirements. More recently (2003) he and his associates (4) determined that opioid related adverse events had an incidence of 2.7% in a population of 60,722 surgical patients who received opioids and these were associated with a longer length of stay and an increased median cost of $840.  The commonest adverse events were nausea and vomiting (67%) followed by rash, hives or itching (33.5%).  White and Kehlet (5) caution about the reliance on opioids alone for the control of acute perioperative or for chronic pain.  They cite reports of rapidly emerging opioid tolerance and hyperalgesia in cancer patients receiving oral morphine.  They summarize a number of studies suggesting that since the Joint Commission standards for pain control there has been in increase in opioid-induced adverse events which include respiratory depression.  The dangers of opioids are now being reflected in the FDA data which confirms the findings of earlier studies.  Though opioids are important analgesics they also have significant risks.  References: 1) Moore TJ: Serious adverse drug events reported to the Food and Drug Administration, 1998 – 2005. Arch Intern Med 2007;167:1752; 2) Bailey PL et al: Frequent hypoxemia and apnea after sedation with midazolam and fentanyl. Anesthesiology 1990;73:826-30; 3) Ashburn MA et al: Respiratory-related critical incidents with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia.  Clin J Pain 1994;10:52-6; 4) Oderda GM et al: Cost of opioid-related adverse drug events in surgical patients.  J Pain Symptom Management 2003;25:276-83. 5) White PF, Kehlet H: Improving pain management: Are we jumping from the frying pan into the fire? Anesth Analg 2007;105:10 – 12.

David S. Smith, M.D., Ph.D.

August 11, 2007

Remifentanil-induced cerebral blood flow effects in normal humans: dose and ApoE genotype

Kofke WA, Blissitt PA, Rao H, Wang J, Addya K, Detre J.  Department of Anesthesiolgoy and Critical Care, Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

Anesthesia & Analgesia. 105(1):167-75, 2007 Jul.

BACKGROUND: Opioids have been linked to limbic system activation and, in animals, to neurotoxicity. Limbic system nonpharmacologic activation patterns have been linked to the Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) allelic distribution. We tested the hypothesis that, in the absence of surgery, small doses of remifentanil produce limbic system activation in humans which varies with dose and ApoE genotype. METHODS: Twenty-seven ASA I-II volunteers received a remifentanil (Ultiva) infusion at four sequentially increasing doses: 0, 0.05, 0.1, and 0.2 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) while receiving 100% oxygen. Cerebral blood flow (CBF) was measured at each dose globally and in the amygdala, cingulate, hippocampus, insula, and thalamus regions by pulsed arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging. ApoE single nucleotide polymorphisms were determined in each subject. RESULTS: Significant dose-related CBF increases, without correction for Paco(2), were detected in all areas. After normalizing for global CBF to correct for Paco(2) effects, the remifentanil-mediated increased CBF in the cingulate persisted, with decreased flow occurring in the hippocampus and amygdala. All these Paco(2)-corrected effects were reversed in the presence of the ApoE4 polymorphism. CONCLUSION: Remifentanil at sedative doses produces both activating and depressing effects in various limbic system structures. The cingulate cortex seems to have the most susceptibility to remifentanil activation, and ApoE4 seems to produce relative activation of the hippocampus and amygdala.

Abstract from Ovid Medline

NOTES

  • Blogmaster
    This blog is organized and maintained by David S. Smith, M.D., Ph.D. Associate Professor of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania. His subspeciality is anesthesia for patients undergoing neurosurgery. For the past 6 years he has had responsibilites for patient safety and clinical care quality improvment in a Department of over 65 faculty who provide anesthesia care for about 24,000 patients each year. Correspondance can be sent to upennanesthesiology@gmail.com
  • Mission Statement
    The purpose of this blog is primarily to provide ongoing contact with former residents and faculty of the Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, U.S.A. Others may also have an interest in the topics presented. We plan to discuss a variety of issues related to the practice of anesthesiology with an emphasis on patient safety, risk management and medical legal aspects of care.
  • Disclaimer
    The content and observations on this Weblog come mostly from members of the Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care of the University of Pennsylvania. However this material does not represent the official opinion of that Department, the University of Pennsylvania or any of its other Departments or Divisions. Medicine is a rapidly changing field. We cannot guarantee that any of the material here is correct or up to date.
Blog powered by TypePad