« September 2007 | Main | November 2007 »

October 2007

October 19, 2007

A CHALLENGING CASE: A patient with epidermolysis bullosa presents for multiple dental extractions

Dr. Schlichter discusses a case of epidermolysis bullosae

Presentation:  A patient with a history of epidermolysis bullosae presented for multiple teeth extractions.  The patient is covered with multiple sores in different stages of healing.  There is a history of full facial scarring from ventilation by mask at the age of 8.  The patient is a MP III secondary to limited mouth opening from jaw contractures.

Anesthetic challenge:  Epidermolysis Bullosa consists of a collection of rare mucocutaneous disorders that lead to the formation of skin and mucosal blisters following shearing or pressure to an area.  Direct pressure or friction should be avoided, as should all adhesives.  In a case review of 44 patients over ten years receiving general anesthesia, different airways were used with success including nasal and oral intubations, LMA, and in one case, tracheostomy (1).

How it was done:  An IV was placed in the left antecubital vein and secured with kerlex gauze wrapping thus avoid adhesive tape or adhesive tegaderm.  EKG leads were placed (to be taken off at home during a warm bath), a NIBP cuff was placed with kling wrap between the cuff and the skin, and a pulse oximeter was placed on the left finger.  The patient was given high oxygen via flow - by during induction with IV propofol.  A #3 LMA was placed.  The patient was then given vecuronium and intubation was accomplished with a fiberoptic assistance and an Aintree tube changer via the LMA.  A 6.0 mm oral Rae ET tube was secured with umbilical tape.  The patient was given dexamethasone 10 mg, ondandsetron 4 mg and morphine 5 mg.  The patient had an otherwise uneventful anesthetic and was transported to the APU after a deep extubation on high flow-by oxygen.  The patient was discharged to home 90 minutes after emergence from anesthesia.

For further reading: 1) Griffin RP, Mayou BJ:  The anaesthetic management of patients with dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa.  A review of 44 patients over 10 year period.  Anaesthesia  1993;48: 810-815; 2) Herod J et al:  Epidermolysis bullosa in children: pathophysiology, anaesthesia and pain management.  Pediatric Anaesthesia 2002;12:388-97.

Dr. Schlichter is Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology and Critical Care

October 10, 2007

Anesthetics and neurodegenerative disease

Are volatile anesthetic drugs associated with neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's?  What is the relationship between anesthetic drugs and post operative cognitive deficits?  What are amyloidopathy and tauopathy?  What is their relationship to anesthesia?  All of these questions are clearly discussed in a recent review by Roderic and Maryellen Eckenhoff on the topic of "Anesthesia, Amyloid and Alzheimer's": that will appear in Cellscience Reviews (2007;4: http://cellscience.com/reviews14/Anesthesia_Amyloid_Alzheimers.html) The discussion is readable, the concepts current and the accompanying figures are in color.

David S. Smith, M.D., Ph.D.

October 08, 2007

Patient generated medical information

User generated medical information appears to be one of the latest trends in internet use according to The Economist Technology Quarterly (September 8, 2007).  They note that the widespread availability of broad band connections has even produced sites with medical subject video.  Misinformation is a concern, though studies have shown that the incidence of harmful advice is fairly low and at many Wiki type sites factual errors are fairly quickly corrected by the users.  The article suggests that patients with rare diseases or unusual symptoms are using the internet to research their problem when their primary physician does not appear to be helpful.  Sites of potential interest include “braintalk communities” a site devoted to problems related to neurology. Organized Wisdom (organizedwisdom.com), another site, focuses on organizing medical information already on the internet and contains search options for forums, blogs and video.

David S. Smith, M.D., Ph.D.

Pain relief after colorectal surgery

Epidural analgesia after colorectal surgery was examined via a meta-analysis of 16 trials published between 1987 and 2005.  Epidural analgesia compared to parenteral opioid analgesia provided significantly reduced pains scores and decreased duration of ileus.  There was an increase in the incidence of pruritus, urinary retention and hypotension with epidural analgesia.  There was no difference in duration of hospital stay (Marret E et al: Meta-analysis of epidural analgesia versus parenteral opioid analgesia after colorectal surgery.  B J Surg 2007;94:665-673.

David S. Smith, M.D., Ph.D.

October 05, 2007

Truth in Science

The Wall Street Journal (September 14, 2007) contains the headline “Most Science Studies Appear to Be Tainted by Sloppy Analysis” The article is based on the work of epidemiologist John Ioannidis who has claimed that “most publish research findings are wrong (Why Most Published Research Findings Are False; PLoS medicine 2005;2:696-701).  He notes that the probability of a true finding is related to the size of the study, the magnitude of the effect size difference, the number of tested relationships, the number of other studies on the same or a similar question, and the flexibility of design.  The author notes that the prevalent practice of examining a study in isolation from all of the other work in the same area greatly increases the probability that a given result is due to random fluctuation.

David S. Smith, M.D., Ph.D.

October 01, 2007

Medical legal cases of interest - OB anesthesia

The ASA closed claimed analysis program recently reported on injuries associated with regional anesthesia (Lee et al: Anesthesiology 2004;101:143-52).  Davies JM (ASA Newsletter 2004;68 http://www.asahq.org/Newsletters/2004/06_04/davies06_04.html) has discussed recent trends in obstetrical anesthesia closed claims..  Davies notes that about 12% of the 310 claims in the 1990s were related to maternal death, and 6% to maternal brain damage in which the patient survived.  They emphasized that a large proportion of the obstetrical claims were for relatively minor injuries such as headache, nerve damage, emotional distress, or back pain to name a few.

Despite the conclusions that complications from neuraxial anesthesia may have relatively smaller costs associated with them, a recent search using Factiva and Lexus Nexus has revealed a number of very expensive settlements as well as cases with successful defenses. As with my last attempt at reviewing recent anesthesia related medical malpractice cases (Clinical Advisory August 2007) my sources are limited and the information provided is also limited.  My search does not in anyway provide information about the total number of settlements and my lack of legal training may make some of my interpretations suspect.  The settlement awards in the case of verdicts for the plaintiffs are most likely shared among more than one defendant and may not represent the final settlement.

Elective C – section under spinal anesthesia resulted in death to the mother with a settlement of $6.7 million.  The claim was made that there was an intravascular injection of lidocaine (Goldsmith v Lechiara, trial date January 2004)

            C-section for fetal distress under spinal anesthesia resulted in anoxic brain injury to the mother with a settlement of $6.6 million (names withheld, settlement approval date October 2005).  According to the information provided “The plaintiff was brought to the operating room where the defendant anesthesiologist injected spinal anesthesia …The anesthesiologist’s records indicated that during the procedure, the plaintiff’s upper extremities became uniformly mottled and that the oxygen saturation monitor on the plaintiff’s finger stopped functioning.  The obstetric surgeons noted that the blood in the surgical field was dark, and the anesthesiologist was questioned about the oxygen saturation of the patient.  The anesthesiologist determined that the patient was not breathing, cardiopulmonary resuscitation was commenced, and a code was called.”

            C-section under epidural anesthesia resulted in claim of post cardiac arrest short-term memory loss, emotional labiality and inability to resume her career.  Complicating the management of the patient was the fact that the patient was a dwarf and placement of the epidural was difficult.  The patient developed breathing difficulties after injection of a single dose of local anesthetic through the epidural needle.  The verdict for the defense was facilitated by the ability to demonstrate that the injection of the epidural and the subsequent resuscitation were within the standard of care.  The defense was also able to present alternative explanations for the patient’s neurologic changes (case i.d. withheld, April 2007).

            C-section under spinal anesthesia resulted in claim of mild hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy with resulting short term memory loss.  There was a verdict for the defendant anesthesiologist (Johntee v Jefferson, trial date February 2006).

            C-section under spinal anesthesia resulted in a claim of spinal nerve injury.  There was a verdict for the defendant anesthesiologist (Schwander v. Esser, trial date April 2004).

Of greater interest are two papers that allow the beginning of an estimate of incidence.  Mhyre investigated maternal deaths in Michigan between 1985-2003 (Anesthesiology 2007;106:1096-104) and noted that of 855 reported pregnancy associated deaths, 8 were found to be anesthesia related and 7 were found to be anesthesia contributing.  Of particular interest was the finding that five of the deaths were related to hypoventilation or airway obstruction during emergence, extubation or recovery.  With respect to regional anesthesia, a 32 year old became apneic and suffered cardiac arrest in the PACU after a c-section using spinal anesthesia, a 42 year old who received a spinal anesthetic for c-section and PCA for post op pain arrested 9 hours post surgery, a 50 year old developed a high spinal and cardiac arrest after an epidural test dose given for c-section, and a 42 year old experienced bradycardia and cardiac arrest after administration of a spinal anesthetic for elective c-section.  Of particular importance from the point of view of risk was cardiac arrest and failed resuscitation in a 29 year old who underwent vacuum aspiration of an undesired first trimester pregnancy under deep sedation and was found pulseless and apneic 25 minutes after arrival in the PACU; attempts at resuscitation failed.

Auroy et al (Anesthesiology 2002;97:1274-80) provides results showing that in France during a 10 month period extending from August 1, 1998 – May 31, 1999, 487 participant anesthesiologists reported their complications after administering 5,640 spinal anesthetics.  In this study there was 1 cardiac arrest, no episodes of respiratory failure, no seizures, 2 episodes of peripheral neuropathy, and no episodes of cauda equine syndrome, central neurologic events such as stroke, meningitis or deaths.

Though serious complications such as death, brain injury, cardiac arrest after regional anesthesia in the obstetrical population appears to be uncommon, severe injury can occur as indicated both by the ASA closed claimed study, the maternal death in Michiganstudy and my recent review of malpractice cases going to trial.

David S. Smith M.D., Ph.D.

NOTES

  • Blogmaster
    This blog is organized and maintained by David S. Smith, M.D., Ph.D. Associate Professor of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania. His subspeciality is anesthesia for patients undergoing neurosurgery. For the past 6 years he has had responsibilites for patient safety and clinical care quality improvment in a Department of over 65 faculty who provide anesthesia care for about 24,000 patients each year. Correspondance can be sent to upennanesthesiology@gmail.com
  • Mission Statement
    The purpose of this blog is primarily to provide ongoing contact with former residents and faculty of the Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, U.S.A. Others may also have an interest in the topics presented. We plan to discuss a variety of issues related to the practice of anesthesiology with an emphasis on patient safety, risk management and medical legal aspects of care.
  • Disclaimer
    The content and observations on this Weblog come mostly from members of the Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care of the University of Pennsylvania. However this material does not represent the official opinion of that Department, the University of Pennsylvania or any of its other Departments or Divisions. Medicine is a rapidly changing field. We cannot guarantee that any of the material here is correct or up to date.
Blog powered by TypePad